本篇论文目录导航：
【题目】版权法领域中“接触权”存废问题研究
【引言 第一章】 “接触权”问题的概述
【2.1】 “接触权”尚未被版权法体系所接纳
【2.2 2.3】 “接触权”纳入版权法体系欠缺法律正当性
【第三章】关于我国版权立法上的建议
【结论/参考文献】版权法中“接触权”存在与否的争论研究结论与参考文献
硕士论文摘要
版权1作为知识产权体系的重要组成部分，其产生和发展都和人类科学技术的进步密切相关。而版权制度本身就是科学技术发展的产物。印刷术的发明，对作品的大量而节省费用的复制成为了可能，2也就产生了版权保护的必要。3版权制度产生之后，科学技术的发展总是对版权制度不断提出挑战，而版权制度也在应战之中不断发展完善。随着技术手段的不断革新以及信息扩散日益加速，相比传统的传播手段，网络从诞生的那一刻开始就注定要引发一场轰轰烈烈的科技革命。网络技术的飞速发展完成了知识的迅速传播，建立了广阔的网络技术背景，丰富了知识经济时代信息传播的途径。4知识产权专有权利的自身属性和典型特征引发了深远的影响以及全方位的创新。5网络技术的发展使得公众“接触”作品变的越发容易。为了适应网络技术带给版权作品保护的冲击，版权权利人开始对自己的作品施加“技术措施”予以保护。然而“技术措施”远不能一劳永逸地成为保护版权作品的最佳手段，于是，要求创设一项名为“接触权”的呼声逐渐兴起。
针对版权法领域中有关“接触权”存在与否的争议，笔者在文章中进行了详细的阐述和论证。论文的第一章，笔者先是引入了对“接触权”产生的背景以及其含义的介绍，直观地将有关“接触权”问题的争议展现给读者，并且开门见山地引入有关“接触权”的不同的含义界定。同时，笔者论述了当下学者们对于“接触权”创设的不同说法，着重引入了相关支持者的立论。与此同时，笔者将这些赞同的观点同反对的意见予以横向比较，驳斥了学者们坚持的“接触性技术措施是”接触权“存在的基础、以及”‘接触权’是版权法专有权利体系的固有权利“的说辞。同时，澄清了有关学者对于”权利“和”权力“两者之间在法理意义上的区别。第二章，论述”接触权“不能纳入版权法专有权利体系成为整篇论文的重点。在该部分，笔者采用了正面说理以及反面批判的论证方式，结合国内外发生的典型案例，批判了有关”接触权“存在的法理依据和正当理由在版权法专有权利体系下是难以立足的，从而说明了有关”接触权“存在的论调是难以自圆其说的。无论是过去还是现在，或是将来的版权法体系都不可能接纳”接触权“成为其具体内容。在文章的最后章节，笔者立足于”接触权“存在与否的争论，发散地展开思路，希望文章本身不仅仅停留在对于”接触权“本身的认识之上，通过对于国内外案例的分析对比，以及对于创设”接触权“于版权专有权利之下的批判，笔者希望本文可以对我国现行的着作权法中的相关规定有所借鉴意义，无论是立法者还是学者们，都可以从中得到启发，以便更好地保证我国的版权法体系得以不断地发展和完善。
【关键词】 版权法专有权利 接触权 正当性
Abstract
As an important part of the intellectual property system, copyright's birth anddevelopment is tightly related with the process of science and technology. Thecopyright system itself is a result of the development of science and technology. Theinvention of printing make a copy with great quantity and less cost possible, it alsomake copyright protection to be necessary.
After the birth of copyright system, the development of science and technology isalways challenging the copyright system constantly. The copyright system is alsocontinuously developing in the process of responding to the challenge. Following withthe ”technical means“ constant innovation and information's accelerated the networkis destined to induce a technological revolution at the moment of its birth compared totraditional means of communication. The rapid development of network technologydisseminate knowledge rapidly, which builds a broad network of technicalbackground and enrich the route of transmission in the knowledge economic era. Theinherent quality and typical characteristics of intellectual property lead to a profoundinfluence and a full range innovation.
The development of network technology makes it much easier for the publicaccess to copyright works. In order to adapt the impact of network technologies on theprotection of copyright works, copyright obligees are beginning to impose ”technicalmeasures“ to protect their works. However, ”technical measures“ is far from bestmeans of protection of copyright works for all, therefore, the cry for creation an”access right“ is arising gradually. As for disputes on the existence of ”access rights“in the field of copyright law, the author provided a detailed elaboration and argumentin the article. In the first part, the author first introduces the background of the accessright and the introduction of its meaning, where the background of the dispute onaccess right has been directly presented to the reader, and introduces differentdefinition of access rights. Meanwhile, the author discusses contemporary scholars'different account of creation of ”access rights“, focusing on the introduction of therelevant arguments of supporters. At the same time, the author gives a horizontalcomparison the views of those with opposing views to the one of supporters.
The author insist on the ”exist of the legitimacy with respect of the access rightexist is based on contact technical measure“ and ”access rights are inherent rights ofthe intellectual property in the copyright law system“ rhetoric. Meanwhile, scholarsclarified the difference between ”rights“ and ”power“ in the legal sense.
At the second part, the author discusses that the ”access rights“ cannot beincluded in copyright law, which is the focus of the whole thesis. The author adopts apositive and negative critical reasoning method respectively and criticizes that thelegal basis and the justification on the existence of access right in the system ofintellectual property under copyright law is difficult to gain a foothold by combiningthe typical cases, which shows that ”the existence of access right“ in the argument isdifficult to justify. In spite of past, present or future copyright law system cannotaccept the ”access rights“ as its specific content.
In the last chapter, the author starts thinking based on the debate concerning theexistence of ”access rights“ .The author hopes the article itself does not merely stayon the issue of the ”access rights“ according to their own knowledge through theanalysis and comparison of international cases, and for the creation of ”access rights“under the exclusive rights of copyright criticism, the author hopes this can providelessons from the existing relevant provisions of the Copyright Law System to eitherlegislators or scholars, who can be inspired from that in order to ensure our copyrightlaw system to be developed and improved.
【Keywords】 Exclusive Rights under Copyright SystemAccess right Legitimacy
目 录
引 言
第一章 “接触权”问题的概述
第一节“接触权”问题产生的背景
第二节 有关“接触权”渊源的争议
一、“接触权”之权力说
二、“接触权”之“技术保护措施”基础说
第三节 “接触权”含义的界定
一、美国“Corley”案
二、“接触行为”是版权作品后续利用行为的前提
第二章 版权体系下“接触权”的正当性分析
第一节“接触权”尚未被版权法体系所接纳
一、“接触权”并非暗含在现有版权权利体系的一种固有的权利
二、“接触控制技术措施”并非“接触权”存在的合理依据
三、不能将“接触权”视为对传统版权财产权的补充
第二节“接触权”纳入版权法体系缺乏法理依据
一、“接触权”无法融入现有版权专有权利体系
二、“接触权”缺乏版权法上的法理基础
第三节“接触权”纳入版权法体系欠缺法律正当性
一、“接触权”背离了版权法的立法宗旨和公共利益
二、“接触权”难以在执法过程中有效行使
第三章 关于我国版权立法上的建议
第一节“接触权”不应该被我国版权法体系所接纳
第二节 完善我国相关版权立法
一、不受“接触权”控制并非意味可以任意实施“接触行为”
二、另辟蹊径：辅以其他部门法综合运用
结 论
参考文献
后 记
