学术堂首页 | 文献求助论文范文 | 论文题目 | 参考文献 | 开题报告 | 论文格式 | 摘要提纲 | 论文致谢 | 论文查重 | 论文答辩 | 论文发表 | 期刊杂志 | 论文写作 | 论文PPT
学术堂专业论文学习平台您当前的位置:学术堂 > 法学论文 > 国际法论文 > 国际私法论文

我国反腐败中引渡法律优化研究

来源:学术堂 作者:陈老师
发布于:2017-01-11 共2775字
  摘要
  
  伴随着经济全球化的发展,腐败犯罪也日益呈现出跨国、跨地区的特征,并出现全球化的趋势,国家间针对反腐败犯罪的合作也随之加深。《联合国反腐败公约》(以下简称《公约》)为各国反腐败合作提供了基本的法律指南,在促进反腐败国际合作方面具有重要的实践意义。《公约》第 43 条第 2 款和第 44 条确立了一套较为周全的引渡制度,其中针对腐败犯罪分子有关引渡的原则性规定,不仅对于传统国际法意义上的引渡制度予以确认,而且对于现有的引渡制度予以进一步的发展和改进,以此来为我国在《公约》框架内与其他缔约国加强国际追逃合作的工作落到实处提供相应的指引。
  
  针对腐败犯罪,除却现存的相对完善的国内法律规定以外,目前我国还积极与其他国家参与双边引渡条约的缔结以及加入相应的国际公约,并在与其他国家开展引渡合作方面也积累了一些成功的实践。然而我国的《引渡法》和《公约》在引渡条件、腐败犯罪的“非政治化”和“非财税化”、“或引渡或起诉原则”、简化引渡程序等具体引渡制度的规定上还存在着较大的差距。在《公约》的指导下,国家展现出了对腐败零容忍的态度和加大国际追逃追赃工作力度的反腐决心,开展对内协调的专项工作和机制,在对外合作方面加强反腐败执法合作机制,但在境外追逃司法实践中仍然遇到一些困难和问题,例如:缺乏从某些国家获得引渡的法律依据、死刑阻碍国际合作等。针对我国目前的引渡法律制度存在的缺陷和在境外追逃司法实践中面临的困难和问题,完善《公约》下我国反腐败犯罪引渡制度的对策主要在于:完善修改我国的《引渡法》、积极与其他国家缔结双边引渡条约、采取相应措施,尽可能避免死刑带来的问题和障碍。
  
  [关键词] 《联合国反腐败公约》;引渡制度;反腐败;境外追逃实践
  
  Abstract
  

  Study on Extradition System of <United NationsConvention against Corruption>(Abstract)Major:International LawResearch Area:International Private LawAuthor:Wang ChuAdvisor:Wang HuhuaWith the development of economic globalization , corruption crimes areincreasingly showing a transational , cross-regional characteristics and the trend ofglobalization , which prompts the deepening development of anti-corruptioninternational cooperation between countries. <United Nations Convention againstCorruption> (Hereinafter referred to as < Convention> ) provides basic legal guidancefor anti-corruption cooperation of all countries , and exerts an important practicalsignificance in promoting international cooperation in anti-corruption. The secondparagraph of article 43 and the article 44 of the <Convention> with respect to thedetailed extradition principles and rules about criminal offence of corruptionconstitute a relatively complete system of extradition mechanism and norms , whichnot only confirm and supplement the extradition system of the traditional internationallaw , but also further develop and perfect the legal system of the internationalextradition , thus provide corresponding guidance for the international cooperationbetween China and other contracting parties within the framework of the<Convention>.
  
  In the light of corruption crimes , China has currently formed a relativelycomplete legal system composed of domestic legislation , bilateral extradition treatiesand international conventions , and has also accumulated some successful practices incarrying out the extradition cooperation with other countries. However , compared to<Convention> , our country's <Extradition Law> still exists large gaps in theprovisions of specific extradition systems such as the condition of extradition , 'nonpolitical' and 'non fiscal' of corruption crimes , 'aut dedere aut judicare' andsimplified extradition procedures. Under the guidance of the <Convention> , Chinahas showed non-tolerance attitude to the corruption and anti-corruption determinationto intensify international extradition work . On the one hand , China is carrying outinternal coordination mechanism , on the other hand , strengthening internationalcooperation of anti-corruption law enforcement , while there are still some difficultiesand problems in the overseas judicial practice . Those problems can be summarized asfollows , the lack of legal basis when carrying out the extradition cooperation withother countries , the death penalty hampers international cooperation , etc.
  
  According to the flaws of the legal system of extradition in our country and thedifficulties and problems faced in the abroad pursuit judicial practice , there are somesignificantly indispensable countermeasures to perfect our country's anti-corruptionextradition system , such as modifying <Extradition Law> in our country , activelyconcluding the extradition treaty with foreign countries and taking correspondingmeasures to overcome the obstacles caused by the death penalty in the extraditionpractice.
  
  [Key words] <United Nations Convention against Corruption> ;The extradition system; Anti-corruption; Overseas pursuitpractice


  目 录
  
  导 言
  
  一、问题的提出
  
  二、文献综述
  
  三、主要研究方法
  
  四、论文主要创新及不足
  
  第一章 《联合国反腐败公约》概述
  
  第一节 《联合国反腐败公约》产生的背景及意义
  
  一、《联合国反腐败公约》产生的背景
  
  二、《联合国反腐败公约》的意义
  
  第二节 《联合国反腐败公约》反腐败法律机制
  
  一、预防机制、定罪和执法机制
  
  二、国际合作机制
  
  三、资产追回机制和履约监督机制
  
  第二章 《公约》对传统引渡制度的继承与发展
  
  第一节 传统引渡制度的基本理论及发展
  
  一、引渡的定义
  
  二、引渡制度的发展
  
  第二节《公约》对传统引渡制度的继承与发展
  
  一、引渡的相同原则和罪行特定原则
  
  二、政治犯不引渡原则的排除适用
  
  三、“或引渡或起诉”原则
  
  四、引渡的其他机制
  
  第三章 《公约》下我国引渡法律制度的缺陷及完善
  
  第一节 我国引渡法律制度的现状及引渡实践
  
  一、 我国的引渡法律体系
  
  二、我国境外追逃中的引渡实践
  
  第二节 《公约》下我国引渡法律制度的缺陷
  
  一、我国《引渡法》与《公约》的差距
  
  二、我国引渡实践中的困境
  
  第三节《公约》下完善我国反腐引渡制度的对策
  
  一、 修改我国的《引渡法》
  
  二、扩展双边引渡条约
  
  三、努力克服死刑问题的阻碍
  
  参考文献
  
  后 记
相关标签:
  • 报警平台
  • 网络监察
  • 备案信息
  • 举报中心
  • 传播文明
  • 诚信网站