学术堂首页 | 文献求助论文范文 | 论文题目 | 参考文献 | 开题报告 | 论文格式 | 摘要提纲 | 论文致谢 | 论文查重 | 论文答辩 | 论文发表 | 期刊杂志 | 论文写作 | 论文PPT
学术堂专业论文学习平台您当前的位置:学术堂 > 毕业论文 > 在职硕士论文 > 同等学力硕士论文 > 人力资源管理硕士论文

公司领导幽默与下级创造的关联研究结论与参考文献

来源:学术堂 作者:杜老师
发布于:2019-02-25 共9954字
    本篇论文目录导航:

【【题目】】企业领导幽默与员工创造力的关系探讨
【【第一章】】管理者幽默对职工创造的影响研究绪论
【【2.1-2.2】】认知评价理论与领导幽默
【【2.3-2.4】】内在动机与权力距离倾向
【【2.5-2.7】】员工创造力及变量间的相互关系
【【第三章】】内在动机、领导幽默、员工创造力三者的研究假设
【【第四章】】问卷设计流程与测量工具方法
【【5.1-5.4】】变量统计及其信效度数据分析
【【5.5-5.6】】上级幽默对企业工作者创造水平影响假设检验
【【参考文献】】 公司领导幽默与下级创造的关联研究结论与参考文献
  第六章 研究结论
  
  随着我国市场化经济的不断发展,市场竞争程度的日益加剧,组织结构变革和技术创新日益受到企业的重视。在推动企业组织结构变革的同时,创新已经成为提高企业市场竞争力的代名词。对于企业来说,技术的革新离不开全员的支持,离不开全员的创新,基于此,近年来学者们开始从不提供的视角研究提升员工创造力的策略,并取得了丰硕的研究成果。随着研究深入,有关领导幽默与员工创造能力之间的研究也逐渐展开,然而,就目前而言,对于领导幽默对员工创造力的作用机制方面的研究仍然相对薄弱。基于此,本文以企业组织员工为研究对象,从个体行为动机的研究视角出发,结合认知评价理论相关的研究成果,探究领导幽默对员工创造力的影响机制。
  
  本研究在对 272 份有效问卷整理分析的基础上,利用多层回归法实证研究发现:
  
  (1)单位类型与员工创造力的显着相关性。
  
  本研究在问卷设计时将单位类型划分为国有企业、私营企业、合资企业、外资企业、其他五类。结果表明,单位类型差异会影响到组织个体的行为方式和思考方式。研究发现,不同的单位类型对个体内部动机的均值差异有显着影响。具体而言,私营企业的员工内部动机明显高于国有企业的员工动机水平。本文认为,私营企业在处理问题时更加灵活,私营企业更加关注员工诉求以及个性化需求,这在一定程度上增强了员工的工作自由度,增强了员工的内部行为动机。比较而言,国有企业在组织架构方面则更为僵化,同时存在严重的官僚主义,这使得员工的工作自主程度相对较低,国有企业的员工归属感相较于企业也相对较低,体制化的组织制度禁锢了个体的行为自主性,限制了组织个体的内部动机水平。研究发现,不同类型单位的员工创造力差异明显,实证检验表明私营企业员工创造力水平要显着高于国有企业的员工。本文认为,这可能和单位员工所面对的工作环境有关,从内部环境来看,国有企业的工作程序相对固定,对创新能力的要求不高,在这种工作氛围下员工创造力可能会受到组织工作氛围的影响。由于私营企业面对的市场竞争要更为残酷,因此私营企业对员工提出更高的要求以适应组织的发展,在这种背景下员工不得不提升自身的工作能力和创造力水平以满足工作需要。
  
  (2)领导幽默对员工创造力有显着影响。
  
  本文研究发现,不同的领导幽默类型对员工创造力影响存在差异。具体而言,亲和型领导幽默正向影响员工的创造力,领导幽默程度高越高,员工创造力水平相对也越高。嘲讽型的领导幽默则负向影响员工创造力,嘲讽型的领导幽默越高,员工创造力水平越低。这与 Pundt(2015)和 Tang(2008)的研究结果一致,即积极的领导幽默能是员工创造力的重要原因,而消极的领导幽默对员工创造力则有抑制作用。本文认为,在中国本土情境中领导恰当的运用幽默艺术不但不是“嬉皮笑脸不正经”,而且恰当的运用积极型领导幽默能够提高领导质量,激发员工的创造力。此外,由于消极型领导幽默的负面作用,因此在中国环境下当领导使用暗含嘲讽意味的幽默对员工表达不满时,将会在一定程度上打击下属的工作积极性,不利于增强员工的工作热情。本研究将领导理论与幽默理论有机的结合在一起,验证了评价理论在中国组织环境下领导幽默的有效性,同时也为提高员工创造力提供了新的思路。
  
  (3)内在动机起到领导幽默对员工创造力影响的中介作用。
  
  本文在研究领导幽默对员工创造力的作用关系时引入内在动机作为中介变量,回归分析发现,领导幽默通过员工的内在动机影响其创造力水平,内在动机在领导幽默与员工创造力之间起着完全中介的作用,并且员工的内在动机越高其创造力水平也越高。因此,领导幽默不仅能改变员工与领导之间的关系,还能够通过影响员工的内心活动,进而深入的影响员工在组织中的意向表现。本文首次使用实证研究的方法验证了领导幽默对员工创造力影响的作用机制,并引入员工内在动机作为中介,证实了内在动机在领导幽默所起作用过程中内在动机的关键作用。研究表明,在领导与员工的长期交往中,领导的幽默行为会潜移默化的影响着员工的内心意愿,这种影响最终反应在员工在组织的表现。具体表现为亲和型的领导幽默通过对员工内在动机产生积极影响进而影响到员工在组织中的创造力,消极型的领导幽默对员工内在动机产生消极影响进而负面影响到员工在组织中的创造力。本研究在认知评价理论框架的基础上,验证了领导幽默、内在动机和员工创造力的内在关系模型,不仅厘清了领导幽默与内在动机之间的关系,也丰富和拓展了内在动机的相关理论,有助于增进中国情境下对二者关系的研究。

公司领导幽默与下级创造的关联研究结论与参考文献
  
  (4)确定了权力距离倾向在领导幽默与内在动机之间的调节作用。
  
  Romero 和 Cruthirds(2006)在他们的研究中提到,社会文化因素是对领导幽默作用效果产生影响的因素之一。但是,在后来的研究中,很少有学者将社会文化因素作为调节变量引入领导幽默的相关研究的。因此,本文将权力距离倾向作为调节变量,试图探讨其在领导幽默与员工内在动机之间的调节作用。研究结果表明,权力距离倾向这一员工权力价值观能够在领导幽默与员工内在动机之间起到负向的调节作用,对于高权力距离倾向的员工来说,亲和型的领导幽默行为并不能够刺激其内在动机,且嘲讽型的领导幽默行为对其内在动机的抑制效果也相对较弱,这是因为他们不愿意与领导之间发展出亲近的关系,而更加接受领导强调个人权威的行为。而对于低权力距离倾向的员工来说,亲和型领导幽默则更能让他们在工作中体会到乐趣,进而提升其内在动机,而嘲讽型领导幽默则会更加显着地抑制其内在动机水平。本文首次将权力距离倾向引入领导幽默的相关研究中,揭示了领导幽默对内在动机产生影响所存在的边界条件,进一步验证了领导幽默作用效果的权变性。
  
  参考文献:
  
  [1] 陈国海, Martin Rod A. 大学生幽默风格与精神健康关系的初步研究[J]. 心理科学. 2007, 30(1):219-223.
  [2] 陈国海, 陈少博. 幽默领导[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社.2011.
  [3] 陈志霞,吴豪.内在动机及其前因变量[J].心理科学进展,2008(01):98-105.
  [4] 段锦云,黄彩云.变革型领导对员工建言的影响机制再探 :自我决定的视角[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(04):98-109.
  [5] 李伟, 梅继霞. 内在动机与员工绩效:基于工作投入的中介效应[J]. 管理评论, 2013, 25(8):160-167.
  [6] 沈靖宜.幽默领导之初探[D]. 淡江大学,2006
  [7] 苏英芳, 郑国枝, 黄贺. 使用幽默对魅力领导行为与效应的调节作用之研究——以高雄地区企业高级经理人为例[J]. 中山管理评论, 2004, 12(2): 223-267.
  [8] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005(02):268-274.
  [9] 王端旭,洪雁.领导支持行为促进员工创造力的机理研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(04):109-114.
  [10] 王先辉 , 段锦云 , 田晓明 , 孔瑜 . 员工创造性 : 概念、形成机制及总结展望 [J]. 心理科学进展,2010,18(05):760-768.
  [11] 王雅萍. 多层次模式下之幽默领导研究[D]. 中华大学,2013
  [12] 杨红明, 廖建桥. 企业员工内在工作动机研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2007, 29(3):33-39.
  [13] 张剑, 郭德俊. 内部动机与外部动机的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(5):545-550.
  [14] Amabile T M, Hill K G, Hennessey B A, et al. The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic andExtrinsic Motivational Orientations[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1994, 66(5):950-967.
  [15] Amabile T M. Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers[J].Journal of personality and social psychology, 1985, 48(2): 393-399.
  [16] Attardo S. The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor[J]. Humor-International Journal ofHumor Research, 1997, 10(4): 395-420.
  [17] Avolio B J, Howell J M, Sosik J J,. A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor asa moderator of leadership style effects[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(2): 219-227.
  [18] Berger A A. Humor:" An Introduction"[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 1987, 30(3): 6-15.
  [19] Botero I C, Van Dyne L. Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX and power distance inthe United States and Colombia[J]. Management Communication Quarterly, 2009, 23(1): 84-104.
  [20] Cann A, Cann A T, Jordan J A. Understanding the effects of exposure to humor expressing affiliativeand aggressive motivations[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2016, 40(2): 258-267.
  [21] Cann A, Watson A J, Bridgewater E A. Assessing humor at work: The humor climate questionnaire[J].Humor, 2014, 27(2): 307-323.
  [22] Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks inthe workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(3):250-260.
  [23] Clouse R W, Spurgeon K L. Corporate analysis of humor[J]. Psychology, 1995, 32(3-4): 1-24.
  [24] Cooper C D. Just joking around? Employee humor expression as an ingratiatory behavior[J]. Academyof Management Review, 2005, 30(4): 765-776.
  [25] Cooper C. Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model[J]. Human Relations,2008, 61(8): 1087-1115.
  [26] Crawford C B,. Theory and Implications Regarding the Utilization of Strategic Humor by Leaders[J].Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1994, 1(4): 53-68.
  [27] Daniels M A, Greguras G J. Exploring the nature of power distance: Implications for micro-and macro-level theories, processes, and outcomes[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5): 1202-1229.
  [28] De Hoogh A H B, Den Hartog D N, Koopman P L. Linking the Big Five-Factors of personality tocharismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, 26(7): 839-865.
  [29] Deci E L, Ryan R M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior[J]. Encyclopediaof Applied Psychology, 2004, 3(2):437-448.
  [30] Deci E L, Ryan R M. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality [J].Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2):109-134.
  [31] Deci E L, Ryan R M. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determinationof behavior[J]. Psychological inquiry, 2000, 11(4): 227-268.
  [32] Decker W H, Rotondo D M. Relationships among gender, type of humor, and perceived leadereffectiveness[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2001, 13(4): 450–465.
  [33] Decker W H, Rotondo D M. Use of Humor At Work: Predictors and Implications[J]. PsychologicalReports, 1999, 84(3): 961–968.
  [34] Decker W H, Yao H, Calo T J. Humor, gender, and perceived leader effectiveness in China[J]. SAMAdvanced Management Journal, 2011, 76(1): 43-54.
  [35] Decker W H. Managerial humor and subordinate satisfaction[J]. Social Behavior and Personality: aninternational journal, 1987, 15(2): 225-232.
  [36] Dorfman P W, Howell J P. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstederevisited[J]. Advances in international comparative management, 1988, 3(1): 127-150.
  [37] Duncan W J, Smeltzer L R, Leap T L. Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior tomanagement[J]. Journal of Management, 1990, 16(2): 255-278.
  [38] Farh J L, Hackett R D, Liang J. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceivedorganizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of powerdistance and traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3): 715-729.
  [39] Fuller J B, Marler L E, Hester K. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactivebehavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design[J]. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 2006, 27(8): 1089-1120.
  [40] George J M, Zhou J. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior:an interactional approach[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2001, 86(3): 513-524.
  [41] Gkorezis P, Hatzitithomas L, Petridou E. The Impact of Leader’s Humor on Employees’PsychologicalEmpowerment: the Moderating Role of Tenure[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2011,23(1): 83–95.
  [42] Gkorezis P, Petridou E, Xanthiakos P. Leader positive humor and organizational cynicism: LMX as amediator[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2014, 35(4): 305–315.
  [43] Goswami A, Nair P K, Grossenbacher M A. Impact of aggressive humor on dysfunctional resistance[J].Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 74: 265-269.
  [44] GoswamiA, Nair P, BeehrT, et al. The relationship of leaders’humor and employees’work engagementmediated by positive emotions: Moderating effect of leaders’ transformational leadership style[J].Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2016, 37(8): 1083-1099.
  [45] Gozukara E. Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship between Humor Styles and GroupCohesiveness[J]. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2016 6(2): 123-135.
  [46] Grant A M. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predictin persistence, performance, and productivity[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2008, 93(1): 48-58.
  [47] Ho L H, Wang Y P, Huang H C, et al. Influence of humorous leadership at workplace on the innovativebehavior of leaders and their leadership effectiveness[J]. African Journal of Business Management, 2011,5(16): 6673-6683.
  [48] Hofstede G. Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad?[J].Organizational dynamics, 1980, 9(1): 42-63.
  [49] Holmes J, Marra M. Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture[J]. Journalof pragmatics, 2002, 34(12): 1683-1710.
  [50] Holmes J, Marra M. Humor and leadership style[J]. Humor, 2006, 19(2): 119-138.
  [51] Holmes J. Making humour work: Creativity on the job[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2007, 28(4): 518-537.
  [52] Hughes L W, Avey J B. Transforming with levity: humor, leadership, and follower attitudes[J].Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2009, 30(6): 540-562.
  [53] Hughes L W. Leader Levity: The Effects of a Leader's Humor Delivery on Followers' Positive Emotionsand Creative Performance[J]. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 2009, 10(3): 415-432.
  [54] Huo Y, Lam W, Chen Z. Am I the Only One This Supervisor is Laughing at? Effects of AggressiveHumor on Employee Strain and Addictive Behaviors[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2012, 65(4): 859–885.
  [55] Jung D I, Sosik J J. Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment,cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance[J]. Small group research, 2002,33(3): 313-336.
  [56] Kim T Y, Lee D R, Wong N Y S. Supervisor Humor and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Socia Distance and Affective Trust in Supervisor[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2016, 31(1): 125-139.
  [57] Kirkman B L, Chen G, Farh J L, et al. Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions totransformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009, 52(4): 744-764.
  [58] La Fave L, Haddad J, Maesen W A. Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruityhumour theory[J]. Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, 1976: 63-91.
  [59] Lang J C, Lee C H. Workplace humor and organizational creativity[J]. The International Journal ofHuman Resource Management, 2010, 21(1): 46–60.
  [60] Malone P B. Humor: A Double-Edged Tool For Today’s Managers?[J]. Academy of ManagementReview, 1980, 5(3): 357–360.
  [61] Martin R A, Puhlik-Doris P, Larsen G, et al. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relationto psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire[J]. Journal of research inpersonality, 2003, 37(1): 48-75.
  [62] Mcllheran J. The use of humor in corporate communication[J]. Corporate Communications: AnInternational Journal, 2006, 11(3): 267-274.
  [63] Mesmer-Magnus J, Glew D J, Viswesvaran C. A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace[J].
  Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2012, 27(2): 155-190.
  [64] Mumford M D, Scott G M, Gaddis B, et al. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise andrelationships[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13(6):705-750.
  [65] Oldham G R, Cummings A. Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3):607-634.
  [66] Parker S K, Williams H M, Turner N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work[J]. Journalof applied psychology, 2006, 91(3): 636-652.
  [67] Priest R F, Swain J E. Humor and its implications for leadership effectiveness[J]. Humor, 2002, 15(2):169-190.
  [68] Pundt A, Herrmann F. Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader member exchange[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2015, 88(1): 108–125.
  [69] Pundt A, Venz L. Personal need for structure as a boundary condition for humor in leadership[J]. Journalof Organizational Behavior, 2017, 38(1): 87-107.
  [70] Pundt A. The relationship between humorous leadership and innovative behavior[J]. Journal o Managerial Psychology, 2015, 30(8): 878–893.
  [71] Robert C, Dunne T C, Lun J. The Impact of Leader Humor on Subordinate Job Satisfaction The CrucialRole of Leader–Subordinate Relationship Quality[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2016, 41(3):375-406.
  [72] Romero E J, Cruthirds K W. The use of humor in the workplace[J]. The Academy of ManagementPerspectives, 2006, 20(2): 58-69.
  [73] Romero E, Pescosolido A. Humor and group effectiveness[J]. Human Relations, 2008, 61(3): 395-418.
  [74] Ruch W. The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic [M]. New York: MoutondeGruyter,1998.
  [75] Sala F. Relationship between executives’spontaneous use of humor and effective leadership[D] BostonUniversity, 2000
  [76] Schnurr S, Chan A. When laughter is not enough. Responding to teasing and self-denigrating humourat work[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, 43(1): 20-35.
  [77] Shalley C E, Gilson L L. What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that canfoster or hinder creativity.[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2004, 15(1):33-53.
  [78] Shalley C E, Zhou J, Oldham G R. The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity:Where Should We Go from Here?[J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(6):933-958.
  [79] Shammi P, Stuss D T. Humour appreciation: a role of the right frontal lobe[J]. Brain, 1999, 122(4): 657-666.
  [80] Sternberg R J, Lubart T I. Investing in creativity[J]. American psychologist, 1996, 51(7): 677-688.
  [81] Susa A M. Humor type, organizational climate, and outcomes: The shortest distance between anorganization's environment and the bottom line is laughter[D] University of Nebraska,2002
  [82] Tang Y. The Relationship between Use of Humor by Leaders and R & D Employee Innovative Behavior :Evidence from Taiwan[J]. 2008, 13(3): 635–653.
  [83] Thorson J A, Powell F C. Sense of humor and dimensions of personality[J]. Journal of clinicalPsychology, 1993, 49(6): 799-809.
  [84] Tierney P, Farmer S M, Graen G B. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: Therelevance of traits and relationships.[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1999, 52(3):591-620.
  [85] Tremblay M, Gibson M. The Role of Humor in the Relationship Between Transactional LeadershipBehavior, Perceived Supervisor Support, and Citizenship Behavior[J]. Journal of Leadership &Organizational Studies, 2016, 23(1): 39-54.
  [86] Triandis H C. The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes[J]. American psychologist, 1996,51(4): 407-415.
  [87] TuYD, Lu X X. Erratumto: HowEthical Leadership Influence Employees’Innovative Work Behavior:A Perspective of Intrinsic Motivation[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 116(2):457-457.
  [88] ?nal Z M. Influence of leaders’ humor styles on the employees’ job related affective well-being[J].International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2014,4(1): 201-211.
  [89] Utman C H. Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis[J]. Personality and SocialPsychology Review, 1997, 1(2): 170-182.
  [90] Vecchio R P, Justin J E, Pearce C L. The influence of leader humor on relationships between leaderbehavior and follower outcomes[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2009, 21(2): 171-194.
  [91] Vinson G A. Aggressive humor and workplace leadership Investigating the types and outcomes ofworkplace leaders aggressive humor[D] University of Minnesota, 2006
  [92] Wisse B, Rietzschel E. Humor in leader-follower relationships: Humor styles, similarity and relationshipquality[J]. Humor, 2014, 27(2): 249-269.
  [93] Wood R E, Beckmann N, Rossiter J R. Management humor Asset or liability?[J]. OrganizationalPsychology Review, 2011, 1(4): 316-338.
  [94] Wyer R S, Collins J E. A theory of humor elicitation[J]. Psychological review, 1992, 99(4): 663-688.
  [95] Yang I, Kitchen P J, Bacouel-Jentjens S. How to promote relationship-building leadership at work? Acomparative exploration of leader humor behavior between North America and China[J]. TheInternational Journal of Human Resource Management, 2017, 28(10): 1454-1474.
  [96] Zhang X, Bartol K M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence ofpsychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement[J]. Academy o management journal, 2010, 53(1): 107-128.
  [97] Zhou J. When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor closemonitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality.[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(3):413-22.
相关标签:
  • 报警平台
  • 网络监察
  • 备案信息
  • 举报中心
  • 传播文明
  • 诚信网站