中文摘要
随着人们生活水平的不断提高，越来越多的人开始关注自己的身体健康，人们的身体健康与运动有着不可分割的密切关系，如果单纯的让人去参加跑、跳等这些运动，时间久了他们会觉得比较乏味，如果让人在音乐节奏下，跟着音乐的节拍去运动，不仅可以达到锻炼身体的目的，而且可以娱乐身心。近几年，排舞与有氧健美操正悄悄的步入人们的生活当中，不仅有利于人的身体健康，人们的心理健康也达到了一定水平，为了更好的发展排舞与有氧健美操，许多组织举办了一些关于排舞与有氧健美操的比赛，有比赛就有规则，为了能让人更好的参加排舞与有氧健美操，本文对排舞与有氧健美操的规则进行进行了对比分析，让更多的人去了解排舞与有氧健美操，从而可以参与到其中来。热爱排舞和有氧健美操的教育指导者可以根据两者规则的不同点以及相同点针对不同的群体编排相应的运动项目，在强身健体、娱乐身心的前提下可以在各种排舞或者健美操的竞赛中取得较好的成绩；对排舞和有氧健美操不太了解的人可以根据两者规则的不同点以及相同点，更清楚认识排舞和有氧健美操，可以参与到其中来，并且可以根据规则的这些异同点更好的去选择适合自己的比赛，从而可以取得更好的成绩，能更好的促进排舞与有氧健美操在我国的普及以及发展。因此，比较和分析出排舞和健美操规则的不同点以及相同点具有一定的理论意义和实践意义。
通过对排舞与有氧健美操的规则比较分析得出以下结论和建议：
结论如下：
（1） 就排舞的团体你项目而言，在人数方面排舞的人数多，人数越多的团体舞在编排起来难度就越大，尤其是有氧健美操，它的操化动作本身就要求非常严格，身体各个部位都有各自的位置规定，在团体舞的编排中有氧健美操的人数不要多。
（2） 从比赛分组来看，有氧健美操设有学生组，而排舞没有。
（3） 从服装以及装饰仪容方面来看，排舞允许化妆、彩绘，甚至更夸张的妆容，有氧健美操只允许化淡妆。排舞服装的选择空间大。
（4） 从成套动作的时间方面来看，排舞的时间比有氧健美操长。
（5） 从成套动作编排要求来看，排舞对舞码以及动作的方向有要求，而有氧健美操队空间、动力性配合动作以及托举动作有要求。有氧健美操的竞技性强。
（6） 从裁判的组成来看，有氧健美操有艺术裁判和完成裁判，由此而得之有氧健美操把艺术设计和完成单独拿出来进行评判。
（7） 从评分标准来看，有氧健美操有对场地使用的评判，在整套动作完成的过程中要均衡的使用场地空间，而排舞没有这方面的要求；有氧健美操更加注重动作的准确和一致性，在排舞的舞码要求中，运动员不但要准确的掌握舞码，而且要注意舞码的方向；
（8） 从裁判长减分的内容来看，排舞和有氧健美操对安全动作都有一定的要求。
建议如下：
（1） 参加排舞和有氧健美操比赛的运动员在参加比赛前一定要认真阅读所要参加项目的比赛规则，明确规则的要求以及评分标准，在充分了解规则的前提下进行成套动作的编排。
（2） 有氧健美操的竞技性要强于排舞，建议青少年选择有竞技性的有氧健美操，中老年人选择娱乐性强的排舞，青年人根据自己身体各方面的能力选择适合自己的项目。排舞的风格丰富多样，应该向青少年一代进行普及与推广。
（3） 排舞的观赏性比有氧健美操高，有氧健美操不要去局限运动员的化妆，让运动员大胆的去尝试、创新。在完成比赛的同时增加比赛的观赏性。
（4） 在编排动作方面，编排人员要充分考虑每一位运动员的身体素质，虽然在有氧健美操中，难度动作没有加分，但是难度动作代表着这一个队的水平，不要局限与以往的固定模式里，新规则下，要想比赛取得更好的成绩需要编排人员去创造新的模式。
关键词：排舞 有氧健美操 规则
Abstract
With the continuous improvement of people's living standards, more and more peoplebegin to pay attention to their own health. People's health is closely related to exercise. Ifyou simply allow people to participate in running, jumping, etc. over time, they will feelmore boring. If you let people in the rhythm of the music, follow the beat of the music toexercise, not only can achieve the purpose of exercise, but also entertainment. In recentyears, linedance and aerobics quietly enter into the people's lives. They are not onlybeneficial to people's health, but also people's mental health. In order to better developlinedance and aerobics, many organizations organized some games on line dancing andaerobics. There are rules of the game. In this paper, linedance and aerobics rules werecompared and analyzed, so that more people get to know rehearsals and aerobics, whichcan participate in them. Linedance and aerobics instructor can arrange appropriate sportaccording to their different rules and the same point. You can achieve better results in avariety of linedance or aerobics competition under the premise of physical fitness andentertainment. For people who cannot understand line dancing and aerobics can have aclearer understanding of linedance and aerobics according to their different rules and thesame point. We can choose games that are suitable for us according to the point, so we canget better results. This can better promote the popularity and development of linedance andaerobics in our country. Therefore, comparing and analyzing the differences and similaritiesof linedance and aerobics has theoretical and practical significance. Through thecomparative analysis of linedance and aerobics, we give out the following conclusions andrecommendations:
（1）On dance groups, the number of linedance is more. The more people of linedance, theharder of choreography. If the number of a group under insufficient number of cases, weshould choose aerobics.
（2）On game grouping, aerobics offers student group, and but linedance don't.
（3）On clothing and decorative appearance, linedance allow makeup, painting, and evenmore exaggerated makeup. Aerobics only allowed little makeup. There greater choice ofclothing for linedance.
（4）On time of actions, the time of linedance is longer than aerobics.
（5）On the request of arranging movements, The requirements for linedance are danceprogram and Direction of movement. The requirements for aerobics are pace, the action ofdynamic property cooperate and scooping action.Aerobics is more competitive.
（6）On the composition of referee, there are artistic referee and completed referee.Therefore, they select out art design and completion to judge in aerobics.
（7）On the scoring standards, aerobics have to judge for site use and keep a balance inusing of floor space. And there is no requirement in linedance. Aerobics is more accurateand consistent. Dance dance in the code requirements, athletes not only grasp the accuracyof dance program, but also pay attention to the direction of the dance program. Onarranging contents, aerobics must complete sets of actions obviously using the second style.Linedance has no specific requirements in terms of dance styles. With completing the entireaction, In the linedance movements,all or part of the athletes do not allow for a long timestill.There is no specific requirement in aerobics.
（8） On Referee minus points, there are 6 minus points content, mainly on the music, time,and dance program. There are 11 minus points content, mainly on equipment requirements.With completing the total action, the instrument must not touch the ground outside the line,and not be longer than 3 meters. No using any harmful devices. Both projects have somerequirements on the safety action.
Suggestions:
（1） Athletes must carefully read the rules of the two games, fully understand rules andscoring criteria, and orchestrated sets of action under full understanding of the rules.
（2）Aerobics is more competitive than linedance, so teenagers should choose the morecompetitive aerobics. The elderly should choose some more rehearsals entertainment.Young people should choose their own projects based on their physical ability. Linedancestyles varied, it should be carried out to the younger generation.
（3） There is no limitation about makeup in aerobics, so the athletes have largeimagination. Linedance is more ornamental than aerobics. Do not give the limitations toathlete makeup in aerobics.Athletes can try to innovate.
（4） In terms of action choreography, orchestration staff should fully consider eachathlete's physique. Although in aerobics, the difficulty of the action did not add points, thedifficulty level of this action represents a team. Do not be confined to the conventionalfixed mode. Under the new rules, Choreographer staff needs to create a new model toachieve better results.
Keywords: linedance aerobic rule
目录
中文摘要……I
1 论文选题的依据和意义……1
1.1 选题依据……1
1.2 选题意义……2
2 国内外研究现状……3
2.1 关于排舞规则的研究现状……3
2.2 关于排舞与其他项目之间对比的研究现状……5
2.3 关于健美操规则的研究现状……5
2.4 关于有氧健美操与其他项目对比的研究……6
3 研究对象和方法……7
3.1 研究对象……7
3.2 研究方法……7
3.2.1 文献资料法……7
3.2.2 对比分析法……7
3.2.3 逻辑分析法……8
4 研究内容……8
4.1 排舞与有氧健美操的综述……8
4.1.1 排舞的综述……8
4.1.1.1 排舞的定义……8
4.1.1.2 排舞的起源与发展……8
4.1.2 有氧健美操的综述……9
4.1.2.1 有氧健美操的定义……9
4.1.2.2 有氧健美操的起源与发展……9
4.2 排舞与有氧健美操规则的比较分析……10
4.2.1 排舞与有氧健美操规则总则的比较分析……10
4.2.1.1 参赛人数以及比赛内容的比较分析……10
4.2.1.2 参赛年龄以及比赛分组的比较分析……10
4.2.1.3 比赛成绩的比较分析……11
4.2.1.4 比赛场地的比较分析……11
4.2.1.5 服装以及装饰仪容的比较分析……12
4.2.2 排舞与有氧健美操规则成套动作创编以及音乐的比较分析……12
4.2.2.1 成套动作时间的比较分析……12
4.2.2.2 成套音乐规范的比较分析……13
4.2.2.3 创编内容要求的比较分析……13
4.2.2.4 难度动作的比较分析……14
4.2.2.5 轻器械以及手持道具的比较分析……14
4.2.3 排舞与有氧健美操规则裁判评分方法的比较分析……15
4.2.3.1 裁判组组成的比较分析……15
4.2.3.2 裁判评分标准以及分值的比较分析……15
4.2.3.3 裁判长减分的比较分析……19
5 结论与建议……20
5.1 结论……20
5.2 建议……21
6 主要参考文献……23
致谢……26
